måndag 27 juli 2015

FINLANDS URANIUM....

Finland is the darkgreen coulored country on map. Finland has 2 uranium mines. One in Sotkamo who 2008 leaked uranium waste into river and lakes near Russian border. 2:nd uranium mine is in Talvivaara also near Russian border and 2010 waste pond leaked uranium waste into river and lakes. Both leakage had weeks after ded fish in river and lakes near cities. And still today have high levels of bequrell meassured.
And on oposite side besides gulf of Bothnia now with high pressure from Rosatom, Vladimir Putin and finish goverment want to build an nuklear plant. Despite of Fukushima and Japans populations reactions and result of Tjernobyl in severel countries.
I understand why Finland dont get any new investors. People are looking for nuklear freezones and free from toxic poluted habitat from gazdrilling . And thoes are found in north part of Sweden. We have foreigners with their buissness from Russia,Japan, Usa and Canada and so on. 
Sadly more politians borgeous politians thinks nuklear power is cheap to have and safe. Old way of thinking and people not learning from serious disaster like Ukrane, Japan and Russia, they have become speed blind in their political agenda.
The question is now how much of Russian population tax money are Vladimir Putin ready to sacrifice and have IMF an limit on Rosatom's started projects of nuklear plants around europe. Cause arabic area are Rosatoms nuklear plant built according to much shorter time plan. Some unfinnished building of european nuke plants are over 10 years old. Are Pyhäjoki nuklear plant going to be unfinnished too. And if one sums up all unfinnished buildingproject how much benefits from IMF and ECB makes their profit in total ? But it also costs eu tax payers a lot of money to no use for eu members countries. More of economical burden, but big profit for russian owners.

And if that not makes an even bigger political gap between Russia and other countries, by russians own choice, as i see it.The question is does russian population agree with the way Rosatom and Vladimir Putin deal with european building of nuklear plants ? From an buissness point of view. Cause with todays electric prices the investors loose lot of money rather than make an profit. And rosatoms plans to use an alreday used reactor to Pyhäjoki they dont see an issue in,but we european does. Of experience from different kind of reactor accident and and issue with older reactors in different parts of the world.

Inga kommentarer:

Skicka en kommentar